| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 355 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,969 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,578,844 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,731,363 |
Bridging technology and confidence: Linking AI acceptance to writing self-efficacy among English instructors | ||
| Applied Linguistics Inquiry | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 4، شماره 1، خرداد 2026، صفحه 178-193 اصل مقاله (461.45 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/ali.2025.9184.1127 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Majid Farahian1؛ Mehrdad Rezaee* 2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of Foreign Language Teaching, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present study examined the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance and writing self-efficacy among 278 Iranian English university instructors. The quantitative findings indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between AI acceptance and writing self-efficacy (r = 0.42, p < 0.01). The qualitative phase examined the instructors' perceptions and their practices using four main domains from Khalifa and Albadawy's framework (2024). Based on the findings, the interviewees indicated that AI tools had alleviated their writing difficulties in (1) Content Development and structuring, with more experienced instructors utilizing advanced text structuring while novice instructors focused on grammar; (2) Idea Development, where AI warranted research design with assistance particularly in identifying gaps in the literature; and (3) Editing/Publishing support (all users appreciated being able to check for plagiarism, though the more experienced instructors did take advantage of peer revision options); (4) Literature Review and Synthesis, the data showed that instructors evaluated texts differently albeit dependent on experience level. Additionally, it appeared that emotional responses such as enthusiasm or skepticism were also mediating factors that influenced acceptance. Barriers to AI use and acceptance also emerged regarding institutional support and ethical considerations. The data suggest that self-efficacy is influenced positively through prior experience or use, and the self-efficacy gains were more pronounced for more experienced instructors. This reveals how a cycle of adopting technology establishes confidence. The findings suggest that AI benefits are conditional based on experience level, institutional and contextual barriers, emotional factors, and contextual differences providing rich practical insights for training programs. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Academic writing؛ AI acceptance؛ English university instructors؛ writing self-efficacy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An Investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670-6
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2019). The role of self-efficacy in technology acceptance. In K. Arai, R. Bhatia, & S. Kapoor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2018 (Vol. 880, pp. 549–556). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02686-8_85
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Bae, S. H. (2016). A review of automated writing evaluation systems. Computers and Composition, 40, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.001
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Mitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? FAccT, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Birisci, S., & Kul, U. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512537
Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2004). Automated essay evaluation: The criterion online writing service. AI Magazine, 25(3), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v25i3.1774
Cankaya, P. (2018). The exploration of the self-efficacy beliefs of English language teachers and student teachers. Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies, 14(3), 12-23. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/724/388
Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2018). Automated writing evaluation: Implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 38, 9–19.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Chen, H., & Pan, J. (2022). Computer or human: A comparative study of automated evaluation scoring and instructors’ feedback on Chinese college students’ English writing. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7, 1–20.
Chen, R., Lee, V.R. & G Lee, M. A. (2025). A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13350-w
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.008
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Divekar, R. R., Drozdal, J., Chabot, S., Zhou, Y., Su, H., Chen, Y., & Braasch, J. (2022). Foreign language acquisition via artificial intelligence and extended reality: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2002–2035. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1879162
Fereidouni, P. Farahian, M. (2024). Is ChatGPT a cure-all? Demystifying the impact of using ChatGPT on EFL learners’ writing skill. Applied Linguistics Inquiry, 2(1),89-103. https://doi.org/10.22077/ali.2024.8389.1051
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
Fu, Q. K., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2022). A review of AWE feedback: types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1–2), 179–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787
Fulcher, G., & Davidson,F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
Hayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R. Indrisano & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 6–44). International Reading Association.
Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O., & Levy, S. (2025). The factors affecting teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: A unified model of external and internal determinants. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z
Hechter, R. P., & Vermette, L. A. (2013). Technology integration in K-12 science classrooms: An analysis of barriers and implications. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6, 73–90.
Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2023). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kan, A. U., & Yel, E. (2019). The relationship between self-efficacy beliefs of teacher candidates and their attitudes about computer-assisted instruction. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(3), 248-264.
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Li, H. (2025). Marvel and machine: The influence of awe on the acceptance of artificial intelligence. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2025.2474436
Li, S., & Huo, S. (2020). Automated writing evaluation systems: An overview and implications for teaching. Language Learning and Technology, 24(2), 41–59.
Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813.
Maican, C. I., Cazan, A. M., Lixandroiu, R. C., & Dovleac, L. (2019). A study on academic staff personality and technology acceptance: The case of communication and collaboration applications. Computers & Education, 128, 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.010
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2022). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Moran, G., & Muzellec, L. (2017). eWOM credibility on social networking sites: A framework. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(2), 149–161.
Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1).
Neysani, M., Nikbakht, A & Jafari, A. (2023). Exploring Iranian EFL Teachers' Trust in AI-based Education Technology. Journal of New Advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics,5(2),1183-1194.
Prat-Sala, M., & Redford, P. (2012). Writing essays: Does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 9–20.
Rahida Aini, M. I., Rozita, A., & Zakaria, A. (2018). Can teachers’ age and experience influence teacher effectiveness in hots? International Journal of Advanced Studies in Social Science & Innovation, 2(1), 144–158.
Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2024). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions toward technology integration, TPACK, attitudes toward technology, and school climate: The case of public schools versus private institutes. Technology Assisted Language Education, 2(4),22-44.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Šumak, B., Pušnik, M., Heričko, M., & Šorgo, A. (2021). Factors affecting acceptance and use of Moodle. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/26904921
Teng, L. S., Sun, P. P., & Xu, L. (2017). Conceptualizing writing self-efficacy in English as a foreign language contexts: Scale validation through structural equation modeling. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.432
Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2019). Explicating the influences that explain the intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 460–475.
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 379(6630), 313–313.
Tokmak, H. S., & Incikabi, L. (2013). An Investigation of Change in Mathematics, Science, and Literacy Education Pre-service Teachers’ TPACK. Asia-Pacific Educational Research, 22, 407-415.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Villalon, R., Mateos, M., & Cuevas, I. (2013). High school boys’ and girls’ writing conceptions and writing self-efficacy beliefs: What is their role in writing performance? Educational Psychology, 35, 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.836157
Wang, T. (2019). The role of technology in the writing process: A review of literature. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(1), 4–14.
Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Pre-service teachers' TPACK development. Computers & Education, 121, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.005
Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510–522.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, Y., & Guo, H. (2012). A study of English writing and domain-specific motivation and self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 101–121.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). An ecological analysis of factors affecting technology use in schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,702 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 249 |
||