پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 361 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,794 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,029,789 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,377,522 |
Law and Literature, Kafka; ; Legal discourse; Right to Reasons; Narrative jurisprudence | ||
| مطالعات بین رشته ای ادبیات، هنر و علوم انسانی | ||
| مقاله 15، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 11، فروردین 1405، صفحه 353-382 اصل مقاله (514.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/islah.2026.10280.1778 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| َAhmad Mohamadi Suhrawardi* | ||
| Visiting Professor of the English Language, English Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, the University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This article proposes habeas narrativum: a translation protocol that treats literary form as procedural evidence within legal discourse and converts scenes of injury in Kafka’s The Trial into administrable minima for decisions in informational regimes. Rather than reading Kafka as allegory or doctrine, the method isolates recurrent formal injuries (non-notice, non-reasons, secret files, and credibility theater) and renders them as four predicates that make authority answerable: (1) prospectively intelligible notice identifying the items at issue, the operative rule text, and the time window; (2) review-ready reasons that are case specific, traceable to the disclosed record, falsifiable by counterevidence, and timely; (3) access and rectification through a contestable record bundle; and (4) a standard of review that prefers evidence over demeanor heuristics and specifies remedies keyed to missing predicates. Read this way, The Trial functions as a forensic archive whose scenes document which minima are absent and, therefore, what a reviewer must be able to demand on the record. To demonstrate portability beyond the literary court, a brief platform-moderation mini-case shows how these predicates reorganize routine review: requiring itemized notices, record-tied reasons, and rectification channels without demanding model transparency, thereby turning literary diagnosis into enforceable review practice in contemporary legal discourse. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Law and Literature؛ Kafka؛ Legal discourse؛ Right to Reasons؛ Narrative jurisprudence | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 70 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 59 |
||
نماد الکترونیک
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب