حریم حفاظت کمی چاههای آب و ارزیابی دستورالعمل ایران (ضابطه 747) در این مورد

Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S. Y., & Nadri, A. (2022). The effects of aquifer and well parameters on Capture Zone and Discharge Zone in alluvial unconfined aquifers. Journal of Engineering Geology, 16(2), 1-28. [In Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/JEG.2022.16.2.1019241

Ahmadi, A., Chitsazan, M., Mirzaee, S. Y., & Nadri, A. (2023). The effects of influence radius and drawdown cone on the areas related to the protection of water wells. Journal of Hydrology, 617, 129001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129001

Ahmadi, A., Mirzaee, S. Y., Mirzavand, G., Chitsazan, M., & Nadri, A. (2025). Determining the quantitative protection zone of water wells in alluvial unconfined aquifer. Advanced Applied Geology, 15(2), 21-49. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22055/aag.2024.46034.2434

Ahmadi, A., Mirzavand, G., & Zebarjad, M. (2023). The drawdown cone of influence zone in water wells in unconfined alluvial aquifers and the influence of physical parameters of the aquifer on it. Journal of Engineering Geology, 17(3), 299-320. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/jeg.2023.17.3.1019242

Ahmadi, A., Zebarjad, M., & Mirzavand, G. (2024). Influence of well physical parameters on the cone of depression in the zone of influence of water wells in unconfined alluvial aquifers. Journal of Engineering Geology, 18(1), 90. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/jeg.2024.18.1.1019243  

Ashtianimoghaddam, Ghodsieh, Mahdavy, M., Malekian, A., & Motamedvaziri, B., (2017). Estimation of Well Field by using Fuzzy Logic in Damghan Plain, Iran. Hydrogeology, 2(1), 20-30. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/hydro.2017.5349

Bahrami, M. & rajabi, S. (2022). Investigation and Comparison of Different Methods for Calculating the Well Radius of Influence in Kavar County of Fars Province. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 2(2), 14-23. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22077/jaaq.2022.2193

Barry, D., J.-Y. Parlange & L. Li (2000). Approximation for the exponential integral (Theis well function). Journal of Hydrology, 227, 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00184-5

Bear, J., & Jacobs, M. (1965). On the movement of water bodies injected into aquifers. Journal of Hydrology, 3(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(65)90065-X

Bear, J. (2012). Hydraulics of groundwater, Courier Corporation. https://books.google.com/books?id=yQogKirZWMC

Bresciani, E., R. N. Shandilya, P. K. Kang & S. Lee (2020). Well radius of influence and radius of investigation: What exactly are they and how to estimate them? Journal of Hydrology, 583, 124646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124646

Cooper Jr, H. & C. E. Jacob (1946). A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 27(4), 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR027i004p00526

Dragoni, W. (1998). Some considerations regarding the radius of influence of a pumping well. Hydrogéologie (Orléans)(3), 21-25. http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6218986

Dupuit, J. E. (1863). Études théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux découverts et à travers les terrains perméables. Dunod, Paris, 352 pp. https://books.google.com/books?id=m-DNAAAAMAAJ

DTIPA (2018). Manual on Estimation of Influence Radius for Groundwater Resources (Water wells and Qanats), No 747. [In Persian] https://doi.org/nezamfanni.ir

Farmanifard, M., Najafi, B. M., Mohamadi, F., & Fathollah M. F., (2022). Estimation and study of privacy interference of exploitation wells to identify vulnerable areas of the aquifer (Case study: Ravansar-Sanjabi aquifer in Kermanshah). Advanced Technologies in Water Efficiency, 2, 85-102. https://doi.org/10.22126/ATWE.2022.7582.1016

Javandel, I., & Tsang, C. F. (1986). Capture‐zone type curves: A tool for aquifer cleanup. Groundwater, 24(5), 616-625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1986.tb03710.x

Grubb, S. (1993). "Analytical model for estimation of steady‐state capture zones of pumping wells in confined and unconfined aquifers." Groundwater 31(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00824.x

IGNSL (2014). Capture-Zone-Delineation-Technical-Report (Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, Issue GNS Science Report 2013/57). www.gns.cri.nz

Langevin, C. D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, Sorab, & Provost, A.M. (2017). Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A55, 197 p. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55

Louwyck, A., A. Vandenbohede, D. Libbrecht, M. Van Camp & K. Walraevens (2022). "The Radius of Influence Myth." Water 14(2): 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020149

Moench, A. F. (1997). "Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer." Water Resources Research 33(6): 1397-1407. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR00651

Nagheli, S., Samani, N., & Barry, D. A. (2020). Capture zone models of a multi-well system in aquifers bounded with regular and irregular inflow boundaries. Journal of Hydrology X, 7, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100053

Neuman, S. P. (1972). "Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table." Water Resources Research 8(4): 1031-1045. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i004p01031

Nohani, E., Babaali, H. & Dehghani, R. (2026). Evaluation of metaheuristic models in groundwater level analysis of Delfan Plain, Lorestan. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 5(2), 79-98. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22077/jaaq.2025.8834.1096

Pollock, D. (2016). User Guide for MODPATH Verison 7–a Particle Tracking Model for MODFLOW. Open-file Report 2016–1086. US Geol Surv Washington, DC MODPATH, 7. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161086

Samani, N., & Zarei-Doudeji, S. (2015). A General Analytical Capture Zone model: A Tool for Groundwater Remediation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(1), 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.05.065

Sophocleous, M. (2002). Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology journal, 10(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8

Theis, C. V. (1935). The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 16(2): 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR016i002p00519

Thiem, G. (1906). Hydrologische Methoden: Leipzig, Germany. JM Gebhardt, 56p. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA5401947X

UKEA (2019). Manual for the production of Groundwater Source Protection Zones U.K.Environment Agency. Environment Agency Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol BS1 5AH. www.gov.uk/environment-agency

USEPA (2008). Systematic approach for evaluation of capture zones at pump and treat systems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ada/

USGS (1991). Description and evaluation of selected methods used to delineate wellhead-protection areas around public-supply wells near Mt. Hope, Kansas (U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Issue Report 90-4102). https://books.google.com/books?id=WlGITJCoakUC

Vatankhah, A. R. (2014). Full-range solution for the Theis well function. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19(3): 649-653. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000833

Winston, R. B. (2019). ModelMuse Version 4: A graphical user interface for MODFLOW 6 [Report](2019-5036). (Scientific Investigations Report, Issue. U. S. G. Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195036

WRC (2023). Guidance document on Protection Zones (Delineation and Protection)

Zand Goharrizi, F., Karimi, H., Karami, A., Mirzaie Badizi, F. & Pourchangiz, R. (2025). Evaluation of some Qanat protection zone determination methods. Journal of Aquifer and Qanat, 6(1), 167-180. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22077/jaaq.2025.9107.1107

Zhai, Y., X. Cao, Y. Jiang, K. Sun, L. Hu, Y. Teng, J. Wang & J. Li (2021). Further discussion on the influence radius of a pumping well: A parameter with little scientific and practical significance that can easily be misleading. Water 13(15): 2050. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152050