| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 343 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,608 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,618,856 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,082,328 |
Investigating the Differential Effects of Task Repetition and Task Rehearsal on Immediate and Delayed Oral Performance of EFL Learners with Low Working Memory Capacity | ||
| Applied Linguistics Inquiry | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 3، شماره 2، آذر 2025، صفحه 69-81 اصل مقاله (337.52 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/ali.2025.9328.1141 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mobin Hassanzadeh Taleshi* 1؛ Masoud Khalili Sabet2؛ Amir Mahdavi Zafarghandi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Abstract Task-based instruction has gained significant attention in second language research, particularly in how task conditions impact learner performance. This study examined the differential effects of repetition and rehearsal, two distinct task-readiness conditions, on the immediate and delayed L2 performance of EFL learners with low Working Memory Capacity (WMC). A quasi-experimental design was employed to address the research questions. Four instruments were utilized: the Oxford Placement Test (OPT), a WMC test, a practice task, and a main task. Thirty-eight EFL learners were randomly allocated to two groups, each exposed to a distinct readiness condition—rehearsal or repetition. Participants were selected from an intermediate-level English course at a private language institute using convenience sampling and then randomly assigned to the two conditions. Both groups accomplished an oral task twice, with the rehearsal group being aware of the second performance in advance, while the repetition group had no such awareness. Task performances were evaluated based on Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency (CAF). The results indicated that although both conditions positively influenced task outcomes, only the rehearsal group showed statistically significant improvements across all CAF dimensions in both immediate and delayed performances. These results contribute to the growing body of research on individual differences in task-based learning by demonstrating that rehearsal is a more effective readiness strategy than repetition for EFL learners with low WMC. This finding can inform instructional design and classroom practice in contexts where cognitive load is a concern. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| task repetition؛ task rehearsal؛ working memory capacity؛ oral performance؛ oral reproduction؛ EFL learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdi Tabari, M., Khezrlou, S., & Ghanbar, H. (2024). Task repetition versus task rehearsal: Understanding effects of task-readiness factors and elemental genres on L2 writing task performance. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/136216882412496 Ahmadian, M. J. (2011). The effect of ‘massed’task repetitions on complexity, accuracy and fluency: does it transfer to a new task?. The Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2010.545239 Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral Ahmadian, M. J. (2013). Working memory and task repetition in second language oral production. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 23(1), 37-55. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/537825 Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 Allan, D. (2004). Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford University Press. Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2005). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(470), 708-718. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2005.s22 Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Baddeley, A. D. (2017). The concept of working memory: A view of its current state and Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (pp. 47–89). Academic Press. Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological bulletin, 130(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553 Bei, G. X. (2013). Effects of immediate repetition in L2 speaking tasks: A focused study. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p11 Bui, G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63-94). John Benjamins. Bui, G. (2019). Task-readiness and L2 task performance across proficiency levels. In Z. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan (pp. 253–277). John Benjamins. Bui, G., & Skehan, P. (2018). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046 Bui, G., & Yu, R. (2021). Differentiating task repetition from task rehearsal. In N. Sudharshana & L. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Task-based language teaching and assessment (pp.119–137). Springer Nature Singapore. Bui, G., Ahmadian, M. J., & Hunter, A.-M. (2019). Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System, 81, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006 Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Macmillan. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 22–48). John Benjamins. Bygate, M. (2018). Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Benjamins. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic research, 20(6), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067637 Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of memory and language, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90018-5 Dao, P., Chi Nguyen, M. X. N., & Chi, D. N. (2021). Reflective learning practice for promoting adolescent EFL learners’ attention to form. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(3), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1766467 De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000489 Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–34). John Benjamins. Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474-509. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042 Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language teaching research, 20(3), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627 Ellis, R. (2018a). An options-based approach to doing task-based language teaching. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Reflections on task- based language teaching (pp. 216–231). Multilingual Matters. Ellis, R. (2018b). Measuring second language learners’ oral performance of tasks. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Reflections on task- based language teaching (pp. 128–152). Multilingual Matters. Ellis, R. (2019). Task preparedness. In Z. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142 Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez–Torres, M. J., & Fernández–García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12843 Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English quick placement test. Research Notes Quarterly, 12, 8–10. Hassanzadeh-Taleshi, M., Yaqubi, B., & Bozorgian, H. (2023). The effects of combining task repetition with immediate post-task transcribing on L2 learners’ oral narratives. The Language Learning Journal, 51(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1901967 Hestvik, A., Bradley, E., & Bradley, C. (2012). Working memory effects of gap-predictions in normal adults: an event-related potentials study. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 41(6), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9197-8 Housen, A., Folkert, K., & Ineke, V. (eds.). (2012b). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. John Benjamins. Hsu, H. C. (2019). The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1255773 Hu, X. (2018). Effects of task type, task-type repetition, and performance criteria on L2 oral production. In B. Martin (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 143–169). John Benjamins. Huitt, W. (2003). The information processing approach to cognition. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from, http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/infoproc.htm Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000509 Kachinske, I., Osthus, P., Solovyeva, K., & Long, M. (2015). Implicit learning of a L2 morphosyntactic rule, and its relevance for language teaching. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 385–416). John Benjamins. Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–46). Oxford University Press. Kartchava, E., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The role of task repetition and learner self-assessment in technology-mediated task performance. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 180-203. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.19013.kar Khezrlou, S. (2021). Learners’ reflective practice between the repeated performances of tasks: Effects on second language development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal9458 Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?. System, 41(3), 829–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 Kobayashi, M. (2022). The distributed practice effects of speaking task repetition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12409 Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085 Leow, R. P. (2019). ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 476-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776674 Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press. Lynch, T. (2018). Perform, reflect, recycle: Enhancing task repetition in second language speaking classes. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp. 193–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400303 Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge. Mostafaei Alaei, M., & Mansouri, A. (2024). Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0066 Muhammadpour, M., Hassanzadeh-Taleshi, M., & Salehi-Amiri, F. (2023). The effects of different task repetition schedules on oral narratives of L2 learners with high and low working memory capacity. Acta Psychologica, 236, 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103933 Nielson, K. B. (2014). Can planning time compensate for individual differences in working memory capacity?. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510377 Patanasorn, C. (2010). Effects of Procedural Content and Task Repetition on Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.126.3.211 Skehan, P. (2014a). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). John Benjamins. Skehan, P. (2014b). The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 Thai, C., & Boers, F. (2016). Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). John Benjamins. Zhou, H., Rossi, S., & Chen, B. (2017). Effects of working memory capacity and tasks in processing L2 complex sentence: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00595 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,360 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 37 |
||