| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 341 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,608 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,602,673 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,066,339 |
The Impact of the Application of Dialogic Teaching Rules on the Iranian High School ESL Learners’ Speaking Ability | ||
| Applied Linguistics Inquiry | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 3، شماره 2، آذر 2025، صفحه 12-22 اصل مقاله (385.94 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/ali.2025.9202.1128 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Javad Esmaeily* 1؛ Amir Mahdavi Zafarghandi2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 2Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Developing ESL learners’ speaking skills who study in Iranian senior high schools poses significant challenges due to the domination of traditional grammar-focused methods. This study investigates the effect of dialogic teaching rules, based on Alexander’s (2017) model, on the speaking skills of Iranian high school ESL learners. In a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design, 43 Iranian twelfth-grade students were assigned to an experimental group (n=22) taught with dialogic rules and a control group (n=21) taught conventionally using Vision 2 and Vision 3 materials. Speaking fluency, accuracy, cohesion/coherence, and interactive skills were assessed (scored out of 25). Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant improvement in the experimental group's speaking performance as a whole (F (1, 41) = 14.50, p <.001) compared to the control group, with significant improvements in fluency and interactive skills. According to Vygotsky's (1978) Sociocultural Theory, Communicative Language Teaching, Constructivism, and Bakhtin's Dialogism, these findings demonstrate that dialogic teaching enhances communicative competence. These results suggest that implementing dialogic teaching strategies can transform ESL classrooms by improving dynamic, learner-centered contexts in which oral interaction is prioritized. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Dialogic teaching؛ speaking ability؛ ESL learners؛ Iranian high school؛ communicative competence؛ Alexander’s model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdul Rahman, Z., & Maarof, N. (2018). Effects of dialogic teaching on secondary school students’ critical thinking and communication skills. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.4 Abbasi Dogolsara S. (2025). A comparative study on the effectiveness of varieties of tasks manipulation on the fluency and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ oral speech. IJREE 2025; 10 (1). http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-977-en.html Afshar, H. S., & Asakereh, A. (2016). Speaking skills problems encountered by Iranian EFL freshmen and seniors from their own and their English instructors’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 13(1), 112–130. https://eflt.nus.edu.sg/v13n12016/afshar.pdf Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (1st ed.). Dialogues. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1717250 Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk (4th Edition). Dialogues. https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/towards-dialogic-teaching-rethinking-classroom-talk-4th-edition Alexander, R. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/towards-dialogic-teaching-rethinking-classroom-talk-4th-edition Ansari, A. A. (2012). Teaching of English to Arab students: Problems and remedies. Educational Research, 3(6), 519-524. https://www.interesjournals.org/articles/teaching-of-english-to-arab-students-problems-and-remedies.pdf Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press. http://www.europhd.net/sites/europhd/files/images/onda_2/07/27th_lab/scientific_materials/jesuino/bakhtin_1981.pdf Barjasteh, H., & Niknezhad, F. (2020). Fostering critical writing through dialogic teaching: A critical thinking practice among teachers and students. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purpoes, 9(2), 91-107. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24763187.2020.9.2.7.6 Behroozi, M., & Amoozegar, A. (2014). Challenges to English language teachers of secondary schools in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.314 Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E. F. (2018). An investigation into effects of metacognitive intervention through dialogic interaction on multimedia listening and metacognitive awareness of EFL learners. Language and Translation Studies, 55(2), 193- 223. https://doi.org/10.177/S0958344016000240 Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Longman. https://octovany.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/ok-teaching-by-principles-h-douglas-brown.pdf Chow, B. W.Y., Hui, A. N. N., Li, Z., & Dong, Y. (2021). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399 Citra, M., & Zainil, Y. (2021). Language learning strategies in speaking classroom activity: Extrovert and introvert learners. In R. N. Rosa, H. Ardi, M. Adek, M. A. Arianto, & Zulfadhli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts 2020 (pp. 161–166). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210325.030 Clifford, J. (1987). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520266025/writing-culture Dabiri, D., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2019). The impact of pre-speaking activities on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ oral performance. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.4.2.89 Dahmardeh, M. (2009). English language teaching in Iran and communicative language teaching. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick). http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b2317778~S15 Davies, M., Kiemer, K., & Meissel, K. (2017). Quality talk and dialogic teaching: An investigation into their impact on the quality of student discussions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3293 Derakhshan, A & Tahery, F & Mirarab, N. (2015). Helping Adult and Young Learners to Communicate in Speaking Classes with Confidence. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p520 Edwards-Groves, C., Davidson, C. (2020). Noticing the multidimensionality of active listening in a dialogic classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652045 Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1995). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/1076/files/2012/10/Freire-Pedagogy-of-the-Oppressed.pdf Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). The impact of phonetic instruction on Iranian students’ listening ability enhancement. Asian EFL Journal, 52(2), 24-35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318340123_The_impact_of_phonetic_instruction_on_Iranian_students'_listening_ability_enhancement Haez, S. G., & Delfani, M. (2022). The impact of online dynamic assessment on the development of EFL students' speaking skills: A comparison of online synchronous and asynchronous DA sessions. International TESOL Journal, 17(1), 4–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1352219.pdf Hajhosseiny, M. (2012). The effect of dialogic teaching on students’ critical thinking disposition. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1358-1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.073 Huang, A. (2020). The dialogical nature of language use in interactive listening: Revisiting meaning in context. Language Awareness, 29(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1686509 Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2 Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching oral skills. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 103-115). Heinle & Heinle. https://www.academia.edu/36244291/Celce_Murcia_ed_Teaching_English_as_a_Second_or_Foreign_Language.pdf Lee, R. (2016). Implementing dialogic teaching in a Singapore English language classroom. RELC Journal, 47, 279-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631171 Liubashenko, O. Kornieva, Z. (2019). Dialogic interactive speaking skills assessment in the experiential teaching of technical English to tertiary school students. Advanced Education. 6(13). 18-25. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.156228 Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=476624 Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001 Meyer, K. A. (2010). Does dialogic teaching privilege the voice of the few? Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383083 Mohammadi, M. Ahmadi, A. (2021). The effect of dialogic mediation on the development of an experienced teacher and learners' conceptual development and actions in the L2 classroom. Teaching English Language, 15(1), 107-135. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2021.131557 Mohammadi, M., Ahmadi, A. (2019). Tracing an EFL teacher and learners’ cognitive and emotional development using dialogic mediation: A sociocultural perspective. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 73-115. http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3015-en.html Niknezhad Naeijabad, F., Khodareza, M. R., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2020). Promoting dialogic talk in a speaking classroom: Rethinking Bakhtinian pedagogy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30495/JAL.2020.677294 Ramasamy, S. A., & Zainal, A. Z. (2023). Facilitating the construction of knowledge collectively through dialogic discourse: Teachers’ perspectives and practices in English language teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/79-96 Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276000978_Opening_Dialogue_Understanding_the_Dynamics_of_Language_and_Learning_in_the_English_Classroom Ozcelik, H. N., Van den Branden, K., & Van Steendam, E. (2020). Alleviating effects of self-regulating the audio on listening comprehension problems. International Journal of Listening, 38(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2020.1788946 Resnick, L.B., Asterhan, C.S.C., Clarke, S.N. and Schantz, F. (2018). Next generation research in dialogic learning. In G.E. Hall, L.F. Quinn and D.M. (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955901.ch13 Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255634567_Teaching_Listening_and_Speaking_From_Theory_to_Practie Sedlacek, M., & Sedova, K. (2017). How many are talking? the role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001 Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. Bergin & Garvey. https://www.scribd.com/document/478157365/Paulo-Freire-Ira-Shor-Auth-A-Pedagogy-for-Liberation-Dialogues-on-Transforming-Education-Macmillan-Education-UK-1987 Shumin, K. (1997). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed., pp. 8-24). Heinle & Heinle. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.028 Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600635452 Soureshjani, K. H., & Riahipour, P. (2012). Demotivating factors on English speaking skill: a study of EFL language learners and teachers’ attitudes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(3), 327-339. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287568676_Demotivating_factors_on_English_speaking_skill_A_study_of_EFL_language_learners_and_teachers'_attitudes Soghady, M., Hosseinpour, N., & Talebinejad, M. (2022). Effect of dialogic tasks on Iranian EFL learners’ language learning anxiety: focus on moderating roles of gender and levels of proficiency. Issues in Language Teaching, 11(2), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2022.68227.701 Suryati, N., Furaidah, & Saukah, A. (2017). The effects of dialogic reading strategy on EFL young learners’ reading comprehension skills. Journal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(2), 546-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jip.v23i2.10992 Thornbury, S. (2007). How to teach speaking. Pearson Longman. https://www.scribd.com/doc/275587410/Thornbury-How-to-Teach-Speaking-pdf Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4 Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245919622_Dialogic_Inquiry_Towards_a_Sociocultural_Practice_and_Theory_of_Education Yaqubi, M. Rashidi, N. (2019). Comparative evaluation of dialogic versus monologic pedagogy among EFL instructors and teacher educators in Iran (Research Paper). Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 13-33. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24763187.2019.8.2.2.4 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,422 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 8 |
||