پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 314 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,321 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,546,637 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,591,253 |
Comparative Analysis of Transfer Function Method with Advanced Flood Prediction Techniques | ||
| Water Harvesting Research | ||
| دوره 7، شماره 2، آذر 2024، صفحه 194-209 اصل مقاله (1.4 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/jwhr.2024.7966.1147 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Jafar Chabokpour* | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In this paper, the evaluation of the performance of five flood prediction models in the Simineh-Rood River, Lake Urmia basin, Iran, is discussed in detail. To this purpose, the performance of Transfer Function, Saint-Venant equations, Artificial Neural Network, Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System, and Support Vector Machine models are evaluated for 2018 and 2019 flood data. Specifically, the models are rated according to their accuracy, computational efficiency, and robustness under different flow regimes and at various forecast times. This now leads to a maximum Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency of 0.91 for the Saint-Venant equations during the 2019 flood event, followed by ANN with 0.89, ANFIS with 0.87, SVM with 0.85, and lastly, Transfer Function with 0.78. The same is the case for peak flow discharge, which was best predicted by the Saint-Venant model to be 193.80 m³/s while the observed value was 200.83 m³/s. This model maintained its consistency with respect to low, medium, and high flows, where the values of NSE were 0.89, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively. However, compared to the other models, which took 0.5–8 s, it had a much larger computational time, 120 s for a 72-h simulation. The sensitivity analysis returned variable model responses to the quality of the input data; an input variation of 20% reduced the NSE of the Saint-Venant model to 0.73 and that of the Transfer Function to 0.44. This study provides quantitative insight into the choice of flood prediction methods in a semi-arid region, with respect to required accuracy, computational resources, and forecast lead-time. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Flood prediction؛ Lake Urmia؛ Soft computing methods؛ Transfer function | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abghari, H., & Erfanian, M. (2023). Quantifying the Effects of Climate Change on Simineh River Discharge in Lake Urmia Basin. International Journal of New Findings in Engineering, Science and Technology, 1(1), 15-25.
Azizipour, A., Kashefipour, S. M., & Haghighi, A. (2021). Reverse flood routing in an open channel using a combined model of genetic algorithm and a numerical model. Water Practice & Technology, 16(4), 1465-1474.
chabokpour, j., & Azhdan, Y. (2020). Extraction of an analytical solution for flood routing in the river reaches (case study of Simineh River). Journal of Hydraulics, 15(2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.30482/jhyd.2020.229739.1456
Chabokpour, J., Chaplot, B., Dasineh, M., Ghaderi, A., & Azamathulla, H. M. (2020). Functioning of the multilinear lag-cascade flood routing model as a means of transporting pollutants in the river. Water Supply, 20(7), 2845-2857.
Choudhury, P., Shrivastava, R. K., & Narulkar, S. M. (2002). Flood routing in river networks using equivalent Muskingum inflow. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7(6), 413-419.
Crompton, O., Sytsma, A., & Thompson, S. (2019). Emulation of the Saint Venant equations enables rapid and accurate predictions of infiltration and overland flow velocity on spatially heterogeneous surfaces. Water Resources Research, 55(8), 7108-7129.
Fan, F. M., Pontes, P. R. M., Paiva, R. C. D. d., & Collischonn, W. (2014). Avaliação de um método de propagação de cheias em rios com aproximação inercial das equações de Saint-Venant. Rbrh: revista brasileira de recursos hídricos. Porto Alegre, RS. Vol. 19, n. 4 (out./dez. 2014), p. 137-147.
Feigl, M., Herrnegger, M., Klotz, D., & Schulz, K. (2020). Function space optimization: A symbolic regression method for estimating parameter transfer functions for hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 56(10), e2020WR027385.
Feng, D., Tan, Z., & He, Q. (2023). Physics‐Informed Neural Networks of the Saint‐Venant Equations for Downscaling a Large‐Scale River Model. Water Resources Research, 59(2), e2022WR033168.
Huang, Y., Liang, Z., Singh, V. P., Hu, Y., Li, B., & Wang, J. (2022). A coupled dynamic system inversion model for higher accuracy in flood forecasting. Water Resources Research, 58(2), e2021WR030531.
Katipoğlu, O. M., & Sarıgöl, M. (2023). Prediction of flood routing results in the Central Anatolian region of Türkiye with various machine learning models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 37(6), 2205-2224.
Li, L., & Jun, K. S. (2024). Review of machine learning methods for river flood routing. Water, 16(2), 364.
Mohammadi, M., Salarijazi, M., Ghorbani, K., & Dehghani, A.-A. More Reliable Determination of Daily Evaporation from the Pan in Cold Regions by Limited Meteorological Factors. Available at SSRN 3989541.
Moussa, R. (1997). Geomorphological transfer function calculated from digital elevation models for distributed hydrological modelling. Hydrological Processes, 11(5), 429-449.
Nazir, T., & Awan, S. A. (2021). Estimated Zones of Saint-Venant Equations for Flood Routing with Over Bank Unsteady Flow in Open Channel. International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 3(4), 96-109.
Nikoo, M., Ramezani, F., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Nyarko, E. K., & Nikoo, M. (2016). Flood-routing modeling with neural network optimized by social-based algorithm. Natural Hazards, 82, 1-24.
Orouji, H., Bozorg Haddad, O., Fallah-Mehdipour, E., & Mariño, M. A. (2014). Flood routing in branched river by genetic programming. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management,
Razavi, S., & Karamouz, M. (2007). Adaptive neural networks for flood routing in river systems. Water International, 32(3), 360-375.
Retsinis, E., Daskalaki, E., & Papanicolaou, P. (2020). Dynamic flood wave routing in prismatic channels with hydraulic and hydrologic methods. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology—AQUA, 69(3), 276-287.
Romanowicz, R. J., Kiczko, A., & Napiórkowski, J. J. (2010). Stochastic transfer function model applied to combined reservoir management and flow routing. Hydrological Sciences Journal–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques, 55(1), 27-40.
Shayannejad, M., Ghobadi, M., & Ostad-Ali-Askari, K. (2022). Modeling of surface flow and infiltration during surface irrigation advance based on numerical solution of saint–venant equations using preissmann's scheme. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(3), 1103-1113.
Sulistyono, B. A., Samijo, S., & Yohanie, D. D. (2021). Numerical Simulation of Flood Routing using the Simplified Saint Venant Equations in Rectangular Channels. Indonesian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(2), 63-74.
Tayfur, G. (2023). Real-time flood hydrograph predictions using rating curve and soft computing methods (GA, ANN). In Handbook of Hydroinformatics (pp. 325-338). Elsevier.
Tung, Y.-K. (1985). River flood routing by nonlinear Muskingum method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 111(12), 1447-1460. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 250 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 142 |
||
نماد الکترونیک
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب