data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37594/375941c7205f5523b21b183254084df9aa358103" alt="سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه بیرجند"
تعداد نشریات | 21 |
تعداد شمارهها | 301 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,173 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,211,835 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,380,304 |
Public Attitudes toward Environmental Impacts from Seawater Desalination: Insights from Southeast Iran | ||
Water Harvesting Research | ||
دوره 6، شماره 2، آذر 2023، صفحه 195-202 اصل مقاله (657.32 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/jwhr.2024.7158.1124 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Hasan Sayyad1؛ Mohsen Shahriari Moghadam2؛ Malihe Erfani2؛ Saeed Mohammadi* 3 | ||
1MSc Student, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. | ||
2Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. | ||
3Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
Freshwater scarcity is a growing issue in water-scarce countries, and the rising population increasingly depends on unconventional water sources, like desalinated seawater. The environmental impact of desalination is crucial, and it is equally important for stakeholders to comprehend these effects as the success of projects relies on the participation and support of local communities. However, there are varied and at times conflicting opinions regarding the environmental impact of desalination plants among the general public. This study examines public attitudes of the environmental effects of desalination plant operations through the use of questionnaires conducted along a section of the coast of Chabahar in the southeast of Iran. According to the results, there is a positive significant relationship between knowledge and factual knowledge of citizens about the environmental impact of desalination plants (p<0.05). It was found that males reported higher knowledge and factual knowledge than females (p<0.05) which can be due to their higher education and their greater role in the family economy. As long as, those with higher marine-dependent livelihood showed a higher knowledge and factual knowledge in using desalinators (p<0.05). In addition, Internet and TV were the main information sources that used. In general, these results can help decision-makers in public participation programs and the trade-off between freshwater need environmental sustainability. Through determining the key role of environmental education, we suggested that education to local people should be placed at the urgent priority of development of technology for desalination of sea water. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Desalination؛ Knowledge؛ Local people؛ Water crisis | ||
مراجع | ||
Ahmed, F. E., Khalil, A., & Hilal, N. (2021). Emerging desalination technologies: Current status, challenges and future trends. Desalination, 517, 115183.
Alhaj, M., Tahir, F., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2022). Life-cycle environmental assessment of solar-driven Multi-Effect Desalination (MED) plant. Desalination, 524, 115451.
Alhumoud, J. M., & Madzikanda, D. (2010). Public perceptions on water reuse options: the case of Sulaibiya wastewater treatment plant in Kuwait. International Business & Economics Research Journa
Daneshmand, H., & Mahmoudi, P. (2017). Estimation and assessment of temporal stability of periodicities of droughts in Iran. Water Resources Management, 31, 3413-3426.
Daniel, W. W. (1978). Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. Wiley.
Darre, N. C., & Toor, G. S. (2018). Desalination of water: a review. Current Pollution Reports, 4, 104-111.
Eke, J., Yusuf, A., Giwa, A., & Sodiq, A. (2020). The global status of desalination: An assessment of current desalination technologies, plants and capacity. Desalination, 495, 114633.
Emamjome, A., Zahedi, M. M., & Ziyaadini, M. (2019). Economic analysis for process optimization of Chabahar Maritime University reverse osmosis desalination plant: a case study. Applied Water Science, 9, 1-8.
Esmaeilion, F., Ahmadi, A., Hoseinzadeh, S., Aliehyaei, M., Makkeh, S. A., & Astiaso Garcia, D. (2021). Renewable energy desalination; a sustainable approach for water scarcity in arid lands. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(6), 1916-1942.
Fielding, K. S., Dolnicar, S., & Schultz, T. (2018). Public acceptance of recycled water. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35, 551-586.
Friedler, E., Lahav, O., Jizhaki, H., & Lahav, T. (2006). Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study. Journal of Environment Management, 81, 360–370
Heck, N., Petersen, K. L., Potts, D. C., Haddad, B., & Paytan, A. (2018). Predictors of coastal stakeholders' knowledge about seawater desalination impacts on marine ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 639, 785-792.
Hoepner, T. (1999). A procedure for environmental impact assessments (EIA) for seawater desalination plants. Desalination, 124(1-3), 1-12.
Jouzdani, S. M., Zerafat, M. M., Arasteh, P. D., & Vagharfard, H. (2020). Evaluation of environmental indicators of RO seawater desalination: case study coastal strip of Hormozgan province, Iran. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology—AQUA, 69(7), 694-703.
Khatibi, S., & Arjjumend, H. (2019). Water crisis in making in Iran. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 2(3), 45-54.
Lattemann, S., & Ho¨pner, T. (2008). Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination, 220, 1–15.
Lesimple, A., Ahmed, F. E., & Hilal, N. (2020). Remineralization of desalinated water: Methods and environmental impact. Desalination, 496, 114692.
Li, C., Gao, X., Li, S., & Bundschuh, J. (2020). A review of the distribution, sources, genesis, and environmental concerns of salinity in groundwater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 41157-41174.
Liu, T. K., Sheu, H. Y., & Tseng, C. N. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management. Desalination, 326, 10-18.
Mansouri Daneshvar, M. R., Ebrahimi, M., & Nejadsoleymani, H. (2019). An overview of climate change in Iran: facts and statistics. Environmental Systems Research, 8(1), 1-10.
Panagopoulos, A., & Haralambous, K. J. (2020). Environmental impacts of desalination and brine treatment-Challenges and mitigation measures. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 161, 111773.
Perry, E. E., Needham, M. D., Cramer, L. A., & Rosenberger, R. S. (2014). Coastal resident knowledge of new marine reserves in Oregon: The impact of proximity and attachment. Ocean & Coastal Management, 95, 107-116.
Portman, M. E., Vdov, O., Schuetze, M., Gilboa, Y., & Friedler, E. (2022). Public perceptions and perspectives on alternative sources of water for reuse generated at the household level. Water Reuse, 12(1), 157-174.
Schiffler, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges for desalination in the 21st century. Desalination, 165, 1-9.
Shahabfar, A., & Eitzinger, J. (2013). Spatio-temporal analysis of droughts in semi-arid regions by using meteorological drought indices. Atmosphere, 4(2), 94-112.
Shahabi, M. P., McHugh, A., Anda, M., & Ho, G. (2015). Comparative economic and environmental assessments of centralised and decentralised seawater desalination options. Desalination, 376, 25-34.
Sola, I., Sáez, C. A., & Sánchez-Lizaso, J. L. (2021). Evaluating environmental and socio-economic requirements for improving desalination development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129296.
Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Applications in parks, recreation and human dimensions. Venture, https://cir.nii.ac.jp/ crid/1130282269154921344
Wang, Y., He, W., Chen, C., Zhang, X., Tang, H., Li, P., ... & Jia, X. (2022). Different countries need strengthen water management to improve human health. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 134998.
Wester, J., Timpano, K. R., Çek, D., Lieberman, D., Fieldstone, S. C., & Broad, K. (2015). Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 16-23. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 186 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 226 |