پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 21 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 301 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,173 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,211,773 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,380,293 |
The prioritization of isochrones affecting peak flood discharge in Neishabour Bar Watershed, Iran | ||
| Water Harvesting Research | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6، اسفند 2021، صفحه 176-190 اصل مقاله (1.7 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22077/jwhr.2022.5058.1054 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hadi Memarian* 1؛ Mohsen Pourreza-Bilondi2؛ Mohamadsadegh Ghaffari1 | ||
| 1Department of Watershed Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Birjand, Iran | ||
| 2Water Engineering Department, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Iran has geographically located in an arid and semi-arid climate in most regions. Precipitation and its distribution in such regions cause irreparable damage by creating seasonal floods. This study presents a suitable model for optimizing watershed management and flood control in order to reduce flood risks. To reach to this purpose, the concept of time-area diagram in HEC-HMS hydrological model as well Single Successive Sub-watershed Elimination (SSSE) is employed to simulate the flood hydrograph corresponding to the design precipitation for each sub-watershed. According to SCS model for estimating flood discharge and kinematic wave for flood routing, the curve number and Manning's roughness coefficient were calibrated and identified as the most effective parameters. After evaluating the different search methods and objective functions, the univariate gradient as best search method and the Nash-Sutcliffe as the best objective function was selected due to the highest consistency of the simulated discharge in the three events. Finally, the model was validated for 2 storms and the Nash-Sutcliffe values were calculated as 0.948 and 0.892, respectively. After calculating the peak discharge of each sub-watershed, the effect of each on the output flood production was determined using F and f flood indices. Then, isochronic surfaces of the watershed were extracted using three methods and the spatial distribution of the sub-watersheds in the area was investigated. The results revealed that the level of 0.75-1 located in the middle part of the watershed is posed as the first priority. Also, it is colcluded that the surfaces near the outlet have played a much smaller role in peak discharge. In general, from the outlet to the upstream and middle parts of the watershed, as travel time level increases, the effect of sub-watersheds on peak flow discharge increases. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Flood potential؛ Flood routing؛ HEC-HMS؛ Isochrone؛ Kinematic wave؛ Prioritization؛ Single Successive Sub-watershed Elimination (SSSE) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bahrami, S., Onagh, M., Farazjoo, H., 2011, The role of flood routing in determination and Prioritizing hydrologic units Bostan Dam Basin from flooding and showing management technique. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation, 1(1):10-26. Bilasco, s., 2008, Implementarea GIS în modelarea viiturilor pe versanți, Casa Cărții de Știință ClujNapoca. Chieyen, B., 1995, Hydraulics and effectiveness of levees for flood control. U.S-Italy Research Workshop on the Hydrometeorology. Impacts, and Management of Extreme Floods Perugia (Italy). Childs, C., 2004, Interpolating surfaces in ArcGIS spatial analyst. ArcUser, July-September, 3235, 569. Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R., and Mays, L.W., 1988. McGraw-Hill International Editions. Applied Hydrology. Clark, C. O., 1945, Storage and the unit hydrograph. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 110:1149-1446. Costache, R., 2014. Using GIS techniques for assessing lag time and concentration time in small river basins. Case study: Pecineaga river basin, Romania. Geographia Technica, 9(1):31-38. DHI, 2009: A Modelling system for rivers and channels – Mike 11 Reference Manual. Djordjevic, B., and Bruck, S., 1998, System Approach to the Selection of Priority Areas of Erosion Control with Implications of the Water Resources Subsystem, Proc. 4th International Symposium of River Sedimentation Beijing, China, 1547-1554. Donker, N.H.W., 1992, Automatic extraction of catchment hydrologic properties from digital elevation model. Journal of the Interdenominational Theological Center, 3:257-265. Ewen, J., Parkin, G., 1996, Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 1. Method. Journal of Hydrology, 175(1):583-594. Ghaemi, H., 1994, Studies to supplementary identification of watershed project in Karkheh watershed. Watershed management department of the Ministry of Jihad, pp 195 (In Persian). Ghazanfarpour, N., Dehdashti, M., Amiri, A., Sadaii, L., 2009, Flood hydrograph simulation of Semirom sub-basins using HEC-HMS model, Fifth National Conference on Watershed Management Engineering, p. 177, Gorgan. Gorokhovich, Y., 2000, Modeling and potential use of hydrologic contributing areas for environmental application. 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects and Research Needs. Banff, lberta, Canada. Izanlu, H., Moradi, H., Sadeghi, H., 2009, Locating of effective sub-basins on spring flood peak and volume of flood using HEC-HMS model (Case Study: Kushkabad Watershed in Razavi Khorasan), Fifth National Conference on Watershed Management Engineering, p. 39, Gorgan. Khosroshahi, M., 2016, An overview to identification and prioritization of flood prone areas using SSSE method in sub-watersheds. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Sciences, 10 (33):59-72. Laurenson, E. M., 1964, A catchment storage model for runoff routing. Journal of hydrology, 2(2):141-163. Mahdavi, M., 2005, Applied Hydrology, vol. 2. University of Tehran. Maidment, D. R., 1993a, A spatially distributed unit hydrograph by using GIS in application hydrology and water of geographic information system in water resources management, edited by Kovar and Nachtnebel, 181-192. Maidment, D. R., 1993b, Handbook of hydrology (Vol. 1). New York: McGraw-Hill. McCuen, R. H., 1982, A guide to hydrologic analysis using SCS methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc. McCuen, R. H., 1989, Hydrologic analysis and design (pp. 143-147). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Memarian, H., Balasundram, S. K., Talib, J. B., Teh Boon Sung, C., Mohd Sood, A., & Abbaspour, K. C., 2013, KINEROS2 application for land use/cover change impact analysis at the Hulu Langat Basin, Malaysia. Water and Environment Journal, 27(4):549-560. Menabde, M., Veitzer, S., Gupta, V. and Sivapalan, M., 2001, Tests of peak flow scaling in simulated self-similar river networks. Advances in Water Resources, 24(9-10):991-999. Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., & Rodhe, A., 1999, Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 98:257-277. Nash, J. E., Sutcliffe, J. V., 1970, River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of hydrology, 10(3):282-290. Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., 1965, A simplex method for function minimization. The computer journal, 7(4):308-313. Nema, M. K., Lohani, A. K., 2012, Runoff estimation from a small watershed using giuh approach in a GIS environment. In Nat. Symp. On Water Resources Management in Changing Environment, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee. Nourali, M., Ghahraman, B., 2016, Assessment of Watershed Management Projects on Flood Hydrograph using HEC-HMS Model (Case Study: Goosh-Bahreh Watershed). Journal ofWatershed Management Research. 7 (13):71-60. NRCS, U., 2009: Part 630 Hydrology National Engineering Handbook. Roghani, M., Mahdavi, M., Ghafouri, A., 2004, Introduction of a method in locating the levels affecting flood peak discharge in order to plan flood control and reduce its damage in the country's watersheds, Case study: Rudak watershed. Research and Construction, 16(4):18-27. Saghafian, B. and Khosroshahi, M., 2005, Unit response approach for priority determination of flood source areas. Journal of hydrologic engineering, 10(4):270-277. Saghafian, B., Farazjoo, H., 2007, Determining flood generating areas and prioritizing flooding of hydrological units in Golestan dam area. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Sciences, 1(1):1-11. Scharffenberg, W.A. and Fleming, M.J., 2006, Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS: user's manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. Smith, K. and Ward, R., 1998, Mitigating and Managing Flood Losses. Floods: Physical Processes and Human Impacts. Tajbakhsh, S.M., Memarian, H., Sobhani, M. and Aghakhani Afshar, A.H., 2018, Kinematic runoff and erosion model efficiency assessment for hydrological simulation of semi-arid watersheds. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 4(2):127-140. Tallaksen, L. M., 1995, A review of baseflow recession analysis. Journal of hydrology, 165(1-4):349-370. Zehtabiyan, G., Ghoddusi, J., Ahmadi, H., Khalilizadeh, M., and Moghali, M., 2010, Assessment of the flood potential ranking of sub- basin and determination of flood source areas. Journal of Envirnonment al Hydrology. Vol. 18. Special section p1. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 309 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 283 |
||
نماد الکترونیک
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب